YC AI visibility / Winter 2016
Most AI-visible companies in YC Winter 2016
We scored 25 active B2B and fintech companies from Y Combinator's Winter 2016 batch on how easily ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and AI agents can find, understand and use them. Lattice leads with 98/100. Data from our crawl on October 18, 2026; scores are a homepage snapshot, not live.
Winter 2016 average score
All-YC average (even)
of this batch have no llms.txt (all YC: 55%)
| # | Company | Score | Crawlers | Content | Schema | Agents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lattice lattice.com | 98 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 100 |
| 2 | Chatfuel chatfuel.com | 96 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 83 |
| 3 | Castle castle.io | 95 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 83 |
| 4 | Luciq (formerly Instabug) luciq.ai | 93 | 95 | 94 | 100 | 83 |
| 5 | GetAccept getaccept.com | 90 | 100 | 93 | 100 | 64 |
| 5 | Thunkable thunkable.com | 90 | 95 | 100 | 67 | 83 |
| 7 | Focal Systems focal.systems | 89 | 100 | 85 | 100 | 71 |
| 7 | Superside superside.com | 89 | 95 | 87 | 88 | 83 |
| 9 | PocketSuite pocketsuite.io | 86 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 47 |
| 10 | Quilt Data quiltdata.com | 85 | 95 | 94 | 100 | 47 |
| 11 | Sendbird sendbird.com | 82 | 76 | 66 | 100 | 100 |
| 12 | Salt Security salt.security | 80 | 95 | 89 | 100 | 35 |
| 13 | Gigwell gigwell.com | 78 | 95 | 81 | 20 | 83 |
| 14 | NetBeez netbeez.net | 77 | 95 | 91 | 55 | 47 |
| 15 | Mio m.io | 74 | 95 | 94 | 20 | 47 |
| 16 | Podium podium.com | 72 | 91 | 93 | 20 | 47 |
| 17 | Copia gocopia.com | 71 | 100 | 66 | 67 | 35 |
| 18 | AmberBox Gunshot Detection amberbox.com | 70 | 100 | 82 | 20 | 38 |
| 19 | Revl revl.com | 68 | 100 | 57 | 67 | 35 |
| 20 | Meter Feeder meterfeeder.com | 67 | 89 | 79 | 20 | 47 |
| 21 | Mason bymason.com | 61 | 85 | 76 | 8 | 35 |
| 22 | MailTime mailtime.com | 60 | 100 | 49 | 20 | 35 |
| 23 | Stealth Worker stealthworker.com | 56 | 85 | 68 | 8 | 26 |
| 24 | Netomi netomi.com | 50 | 91 | 40 | 8 | 26 |
| 25 | Pave paveai.com | 46 | 80 | 38 | 8 | 26 |
Sub-scores: Crawlers = AI crawler access, Content = answer-engine content, Schema = structured data, Agents = agent readiness (llms.txt, API/MCP). Ties share a rank.
YC Winter 2016 vs all of YC
| Area | Winter 2016 | All YC |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 77 | 77 |
| AI crawler access | 94 | 93 |
| Answer-engine content | 80 | 82 |
| Structured data | 60 | 62 |
| Agent readiness | 56 | 56 |
Most common gaps in YC Winter 2016
Want to climb the leaderboard? The RankRoot Traffic Boost ($49 once) includes 7 days of Pro to audit up to 50 pages per scan and generate llms.txt, llms-full.txt and per-page JSON-LD, and your product featured across RankRoot for 30 days (homepage, launch directory, your industry page and the tool AI agents use to find products), live today with a dofollow link and a public count of every visitor sent. Get the Traffic Boost · $49 · or have it done for you
Show your rank in YC Winter 2016
Add a badge to your site, docs or README that links to this leaderboard. Replace lattice.com with your domain, or copy the ready-made snippet from your company's page. Example for Lattice:
<a href="https://getrankroot.com/yc/winter-2016"><img src="https://getrankroot.com/api/badge/yc?domain=lattice.com" alt="YC Winter 2016 · AI visibility #1 of 25" height="20"></a>
[](https://getrankroot.com/yc/winter-2016)
Other YC batches
All YC companiesFall 2026Summer 2026Spring 2026Winter 2026Fall 2025Summer 2025Spring 2025Winter 2025Fall 2024Summer 2024Winter 2024Summer 2023Winter 2023Summer 2022Winter 2022Summer 2021Winter 2021Summer 2020Winter 2020Summer 2019Winter 2019Summer 2018Winter 2018Summer 2017Winter 2017Summer 2016Summer 2015Winter 2015Summer 2014Winter 2014Summer 2013Winter 2013Summer 2012Winter 2012Summer 2011Winter 2011
Methodology: how the YC dataset was built. Batch labels come from Y Combinator's public directory; RankRoot is not affiliated with Y Combinator.