AI Visibility Index / Industries / Monitoring & observability
Most AI-visible monitoring tools (2026)
We scored 26 monitoring tools on how easily ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and AI agents can find, understand and use them. OpenStatus leads with 100/100. Data from our crawl on October 18, 2026; scores are a homepage snapshot, not live.
Monitoring tools average score
Whole-index average (+2 for this industry)
of these sites miss “Question & answer content”
| # | Product | Score | Crawlers | Content | Schema | Agents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenStatus openstatus.dev | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 1 | SigNoz signoz.io | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 3 | Uptrace uptrace.dev | 99 | 100 | 96 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 | Hyperping hyperping.io | 98 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 | Sentry sentry.io | 98 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 | UptimeRobot uptimerobot.com | 98 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 7 | Checkly checklyhq.com | 97 | 95 | 94 | 100 | 100 |
| 8 | AppSignal appsignal.com | 96 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 83 |
| 8 | Axiom axiom.co | 96 | 100 | 87 | 100 | 100 |
| 10 | Grafana Labs grafana.com | 95 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 83 |
| 10 | incident.io incident.io | 95 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 83 |
| 10 | PagerDuty pagerduty.com | 95 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 83 |
| 13 | Rollbar rollbar.com | 93 | 100 | 89 | 100 | 83 |
| 14 | Dynatrace dynatrace.com | 92 | 100 | 94 | 100 | 74 |
| 14 | New Relic newrelic.com | 92 | 100 | 85 | 100 | 83 |
| 16 | Statuspage statuspage.io | 90 | 95 | 87 | 67 | 100 |
| 17 | Instatus instatus.com | 86 | 100 | 66 | 100 | 83 |
| 18 | Opsgenie opsgenie.com | 83 | 95 | 91 | 8 | 100 |
| 19 | Cronitor cronitor.io | 82 | 95 | 87 | 8 | 100 |
| 19 | Raygun raygun.com | 82 | 100 | 94 | 67 | 47 |
| 21 | Honeycomb honeycomb.io | 80 | 95 | 89 | 20 | 83 |
| 22 | Datadog datadoghq.com | 79 | 100 | 88 | 20 | 71 |
| 23 | Better Stack betterstack.com | 75 | 100 | 94 | 20 | 47 |
| 23 | BugSnag bugsnag.com | 75 | 100 | 94 | 20 | 47 |
| 25 | Healthchecks.io healthchecks.io | 74 | 89 | 94 | 8 | 64 |
| 26 | Better Uptime better-uptime.com | 38 | 72 | 22 | 8 | 26 |
Sub-scores: Crawlers = AI crawler access, Content = answer-engine content, Schema = structured data, Agents = agent readiness (llms.txt, API/MCP). Ties share a rank.
Monitoring tools vs the whole index
| Area | This industry | All 538 sites |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 88 | 86 |
| AI crawler access | 97 | 97 |
| Answer-engine content | 90 | 89 |
| Structured data | 71 | 71 |
| Agent readiness | 82 | 76 |
Most common gaps among monitoring tools
Want to climb the ranking? The RankRoot Traffic Boost ($49 once) includes 7 days of Pro to audit up to 50 pages per scan and generate llms.txt, llms-full.txt and per-page JSON-LD, and your product featured across RankRoot for 30 days (homepage, launch directory, your industry page and the tool AI agents use to find products), live today with a dofollow link and a public count of every visitor sent. Get the Traffic Boost · $49 · or have it done for you
Listed here? Open your product's page to grab a “Ranked #N in Monitoring & observability” badge for your site or README.
FAQ
Which monitoring tools are the most visible to AI search engines?
In our October 18, 2026 crawl, the top-scoring monitoring tools were OpenStatus (100/100), SigNoz (100/100), Uptrace (99/100). The score measures how easily ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and AI agents can crawl, understand and use each product's homepage.
How do monitoring tools compare with the rest of the AI Visibility Index?
The 26 monitoring tools we track average 88/100, 2 points above the 86/100 average across all 538 SaaS and AI sites in the index.
What is the most common AI visibility gap among monitoring tools?
69% of the monitoring tools we checked miss "Question & answer content" (vs 71% across the whole index). Fix: Add an FAQ answering the exact questions buyers ask ChatGPT ("best X for Y", "X vs Y", "how much does X cost").
How is the AI visibility score calculated?
RankRoot checks four areas on each homepage: AI crawler access (robots.txt rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and others), answer-engine content (title, headings, FAQ-style content, server-rendered text), structured data (JSON-LD, Organization/Product schema) and agent readiness (llms.txt, discoverable API or MCP server). Each area is scored 0 to 100 and combined into one score.
When was this data collected, and can a company update its score?
Scores are a snapshot from our crawler on October 18, 2026. They are not updated automatically. Anyone can rescan a site live for free, and we refresh the index periodically.
My monitoring tool isn't listed. How do I see where it would rank?
Run a free scan at https://getrankroot.com/report. You get the same score and checks, so you can compare it directly with this leaderboard.
Other industry leaderboards
Email marketing & newslettersEmail & messaging APIsSales, CRM & lead generationCustomer support & chatbotsProduct analytics & experimentationFeedback, forms & bug reportingProduct adoption & interactive demosCode review & code qualityCI/CD & testingGit hosting & engineering intelligenceAI coding assistants & app buildersNo-code & internal tool buildersAPI development & documentationAI models & model APIsGPU cloud & AI inferenceAI agent builders & automationAgent tools, MCP & integrationsLLM observability & evalsSearch engines & vector databasesWeb scraping & search APIsDatabases & backend platformsCloud hosting & deploymentData pipelines, BI & document AISecurity, auth & identityPayments, finance & HRAI video & audio creationVoice AI & speechAI meeting assistantsTasks, calendars & schedulingProject & work managementNotes & knowledge basesWebsite builders, CMS & ecommerceSEO & AI search visibilityAI writing assistantsDesign, presentations & AI imagesMedia, file & image APIsBrowsers, search & AI directories
Methodology and full findings: State of AI Visibility 2026. Industry labels are assigned by RankRoot from each product's own homepage description.